{"id":3032,"date":"2023-03-10T23:03:25","date_gmt":"2023-03-10T23:03:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/handweavingacademystatic.memberhost.io\/?p=3032"},"modified":"2024-08-29T09:52:03","modified_gmt":"2024-08-29T16:52:03","slug":"sampling-its-not-what-you-think","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/handweavingacademy.com\/sampling-its-not-what-you-think\/","title":{"rendered":"Sampling: It’s not what you think"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Few topics seem more divisive for weavers than sampling. Some people enjoy sampling and weave a lot of samples, others hate sampling and rarely do it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
I\u2019ve heard many weavers say, \u201cYes, I really should sample, but I rarely do.\u201d Often, weavers treat sampling as a moral <\/em>good – that is, a good habit, reflecting discipline, that everyone should do. (And feel guilty about NOT doing.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n That\u2019s not how I view sampling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Samples, as I see it, are simply experiments. You invest a little time and materials to find out whether some aspect of your design will work. Samples don\u2019t have to be woven<\/em> samples – they can be anything that helps you test your design. A black-and-white photo, a draft simulation, a yarn test for stretchiness – these are all ways of sampling. They all help you test some aspect of your design.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Sampling is not a universal \u201cshould,\u201d and a decision not to sample is certainly not a moral failure. Sometimes a sample is worthwhile, and sometimes it isn\u2019t. Whether to sample is a judgment call that should be made on a project-by-project, sample-by-sample basis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Creating a sample is basically buying insurance. You do it to reduce the risk that you won\u2019t like your finished design. Like insurance, the sample will cost you something – time, materials, and\/or aggravation. And like insurance, the sample is only worth \u201cbuying\u201d if the cost of the sample – both physically and emotionally – exceeds the likely cost of NOT doing the sample.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Now, how much does it cost you to skip the sample? It depends on two things: the probability of making a mistake, and the cost of the mistake if it does happen. <\/p>\n\n\n\n If you\u2019re working with familiar yarns, drafts, and colors, you can predict with reasonable confidence what\u2019s going to result. The likelihood of a problem is relatively low.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If, on the other hand, you\u2019re working with projects that involve new techniques or materials, the probability of a problem is considerably higher.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The next thing to consider is how much will it cost if you DO make a design mistake? Not just in money, but in time, materials, and frustration. A mistake that wastes $3 worth of yarn but which takes you 10 hours to correct, gritting your teeth the entire time, is still an expensive mistake to make!<\/p>\n\n\n\n Now, weigh the cost and the likelihood of error against the cost of your sample. Again, this is measured in time, money\/materials, AND frustration. If you hate sampling, then the cost of the frustration should be worked into the \u201cprice\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If the sample is less expensive than the likely cost of the error, then it\u2019s worth buying the \u201cinsurance\u201d and doing the sample. If it\u2019s more expensive, then it isn\u2019t. If the costs are close? Use your judgment.<\/p>\n\n\n\nWhat\u2019s a sample?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
When should you sample?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n